Proportional Representation is Not a Panacea


PR

Proportional Representation is Not a Panacea. One blogger, commenting on Michael Chong’s new Reform Act seems to think that it is. This was my response to his assertion.

I agree that Proportional Representation (PR) would be a good thing for Canadian Democracy. For example if we had PR we wouldn’t have Free Trade because the Progressive Conservatives under Mulroney brought in Free Trade with only 43% of the popular vote. All other parties opposed Free Trade. That means the will of 57% percent of Canadian voters was ignored due to our present deficient electoral system.

The point I want to make is that Canada’s main problem with politics and political parties is not just who represents them as a party, but how Canadians are being represented. What is the huge benefit in getting the party in that you wanted when all the party leaders  tell their MP’s (our representatives) how to vote. When I vote, I vote for the representative to vote for what we believe in the constituency; we do not vote for what the leader wants or what their party believes.

To refine the idea, do we want our opinions considered or do we want to have someone think for us? To elect someone to think for us is to say we want the status quo of a Parliament of leaders representing peasants. In the dark ages the leaders had education and the peasants had to have someone to think for them because they were too ignorant to think for themselves. Do we want a modern democracy where we, the electorate, are smart enough and informed enough to give our input to our representatives and they take our wishes to Ottawa, or do we want to stay as ignorant peasants that need someone to think for us?

I once told an MP that I expect a representative to ask the constituents what they want and vote in Parliament accordingly. She said to me, “I was voted in to make the hard decisions for my constituents”. I asked her if she thought that I and the other constituents were too stupid to think for ourselves. She saw the corner she had painted herself into and so she said “the constituents do not have all the information like I do” at which I answered “So whose fault is it that your constituents are not being informed?”

It is not which party is representing the People that is the problem, the problem is HOW we are being represented, and the attitude of those that representing us, and the Party System that both allows them to misrepresent us.

Other articles that you might enjoy:

The Party System – An Illusion of Democracy

https://pushinback.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/the-party-system-an-illusion-of-a-democracy-9/

Is Your Representative an Elitist or a Democrat

https://pushinback.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/essential-knowledge-needed-to-grow-a-democracy-part-5/

 

 

Advertisements

About pushinback

Back in 1993, I attended an anti-Nafta rally in Ottawa along with over 110,000 others. But despite the overwhelming opposition to NAFTA, the steamroller rolled on. It was there that I came to understand the one vital thing that I have been preaching ever since. There are so many issues, and so many fighting each issue, we are all spinning our wheels, and wasting our time, talents and energy, because each election, we give the politicians our power and so the deck is stacked against us. I said it that day and I say it with more fervency today. We all have one issue that we share, and we should all stop fighting for our own issues and losing anyways, and we should fight to achieve that one thing that we all share. We Canadians all have to fight to finally get a say between elections. We need to fight to make politicians accountable to us, the people. If there is no accountability, and the people have no say between elections, we have no Democracy. My Blog is written to teach the reader the essential knowledge of freedom and Democracy. Please read, and learn. I am one person, but I leave you my witness that one person is not powerless, only first you must first learn and then act. Let the democratic revolution begin. Kindest regards, Rob McQueen
This entry was posted in Canadian Politics, Democracy, Esencial Information for Democracy, Learning about Democracy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Proportional Representation is Not a Panacea

  1. Pingback: Is Your Representatives an Elitist or a Democrat? (5) | pushinback

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s